Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Proper Cohorting

Suffolk, Virginia Survey Completed on 10-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by improper implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and cohorting practices. A resident with an infected diabetic foot ulcer, confirmed to be colonized with multiple organisms including Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, was placed under Contact Precautions. However, the resident's roommate, who had a PEG tube and therefore met criteria for EBP, did not have appropriate EBP signage posted. This omission was observed during a facility tour, and staff interviews confirmed that the required precautions were not in place for the roommate. The Unit Manager acknowledged the error, stating that after consultation with the Infection Preventionist, it was determined that the two residents should not have been cohorted together. The roommate was subsequently moved, and EBP signage was posted, but these actions occurred only after the deficiency was identified. The facility's own infection prevention and control policy required all staff to follow established procedures, which was not adhered to in this instance, resulting in a lapse in infection control practices.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙