Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Maintain Complete and Accurate Clinical Records

Staunton, Virginia Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for two residents. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, there was an unwitnessed fall resulting in a large hematoma and bruising. Although nursing notes indicated that neurological checks were initiated following the fall, no documentation of these checks was found in the clinical record. The director of nursing confirmed the absence of neuro check documentation, attributing it to a transition from electronic to paper records at the time. Paper copies of the neuro checks were later located but had not been scanned into the electronic health record, as the medical records clerk had not prioritized older documents. In a separate incident, another resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility's investigation indicated that the resident was assessed for physical and emotional concerns, but there was no documentation of these assessments or any progress notes related to the incident in the clinical record. The director of nursing stated that assessments were performed at the time but should have been documented by nursing staff, in accordance with facility policy requiring documentation of incidents, findings, and corrective measures in the resident's medical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙