Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Prevent and Manage Pressure Ulcer Due to Inadequate Assessment and Documentation

Yorktown, Virginia Survey Completed on 10-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including acute stroke with craniotomy, paralysis, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and severe cognitive loss, was admitted to the facility and identified as being at high risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and required two-person assistance for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. Despite these risk factors, the facility failed to provide consistent and accurate skin care assessments, as no skin assessments were documented until several days after the initial identification of a wound. The first Braden skin assessment was completed late, and only two were performed during the resident's stay, both indicating high risk. Upon review, it was found that wound care orders and documentation were inconsistent and incomplete. Initial treatment orders lacked clear documentation of who ordered them and did not include wound descriptions or measurements. There was a significant delay in wound evaluation and assessment, with no physician documentation of the wound until eight days after its identification. Additionally, there were gaps in wound care treatment, with no ordered treatment for the sacral wound for a 12-day period, and multiple documented omissions of wound care treatments on several days. The facility's policy required weekly skin assessments, but these were not completed as required. Staff interviews revealed confusion and errors in documentation, with discrepancies between nursing notes regarding the presence of the wound. The LPN interviewed acknowledged that the pressure ulcer was not present on admission and occurred after the resident was admitted. The lack of timely and accurate assessments, incomplete documentation, and missed treatments contributed to the development and delayed management of an avoidable stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙