Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0725
E

Insufficient CNA Staffing on Unit During Weekend Shifts

Charlottesville, Virginia Survey Completed on 09-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff on one of its units during a specific weekend, as evidenced by staffing records and staff interviews. Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data and as-worked schedules showed that only two certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were scheduled for a unit with a census of 59 residents during the day shift on both Saturday and Sunday. Staff interviews confirmed that the standard staffing expectation was four to five CNAs per shift, and both the DON and CNAs acknowledged that the unit was understaffed on those days. The CNAs reported that, due to the low staffing, they had to prioritize essential care tasks, resulting in showers not being completed, though hygiene and feeding needs were met with assistance from other nursing staff. The deficiency was further supported by statements from the administrator and unit manager, who confirmed that staffing levels did not always meet the facility's assessment, especially on weekends due to turnover and call-outs. Despite the low staffing, there were no documented incidents, grievances, or resident council concerns related to unmet needs or accidents during the period in question. Resident interviews did not reveal significant concerns, except for one resident who requested a change in shower scheduling, which was subsequently addressed. The facility's own assessment indicated that four to five CNAs per shift were needed based on census and acuity, but this standard was not met on the dates reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙