Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Maintain Accurate and Comprehensive Care Plans

Granbury, Texas Survey Completed on 09-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that accurately reflected the current needs and interventions for three residents. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and a stage 4 pressure ulcer, the care plan included negative pressure wound therapy as an intervention, despite there being no physician order or evidence that this therapy was ever provided. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not receiving negative pressure therapy, and the care plan was not updated to reflect the actual care being provided. Another resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and receiving hemodialysis, had a care plan that only addressed enhanced barrier precautions for her vascular access device. The care plan did not include necessary interventions such as assessment and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis, nor did it document ongoing communication with the dialysis facility. Staff interviews revealed that the omission was not identified or corrected during interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviews, and the responsibility for updating the care plan was not clearly followed. A third resident, who was cognitively intact but dependent on staff for transfers and had a DNR order, had a care plan that did not accurately reflect her current transfer needs, sleeping arrangements, or code status. The care plan listed one-person assistance for transfers, while staff confirmed that a mechanical lift with two staff was required. Additionally, the care plan indicated a full code status, while the medical record and physician orders documented DNR status. Staff interviews indicated that these discrepancies were not addressed due to lapses in updating the care plan following changes in the resident's condition and preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙