Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Maintain Accurate and Updated Care Plans for Multiple Residents

Mount Pleasant, Texas Survey Completed on 11-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for three residents, resulting in deficiencies related to care planning and documentation. For one resident with a history of diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertension, a pressure ulcer present upon re-admission was not included in the care plan until several weeks later, despite nursing documentation and staff interviews confirming the wound's existence and the expectation that such conditions be care planned promptly. The care plan was only updated after a significant delay, even though the wound was reported to the MDS Nurse at the morning meeting following re-admission. Another resident with mobility issues and a history of elopement risk was documented in the care plan as having a wander guard in place, but observations and staff interviews confirmed that the resident did not have a wander guard at the time. The administrator confirmed that no residents currently had wander guards, indicating a discrepancy between the care plan and the resident's actual status. This inconsistency was not identified or corrected by the staff responsible for updating care plans. A third resident, diagnosed with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, was documented in the care plan as residing on a secured memory care unit due to exit-seeking behaviors. However, social services notes and direct observation showed that the resident had been moved to a regular room months earlier, and the care plan was not updated to reflect this change. Interviews with the DON and MDS Nurse revealed confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibilities for updating care plans, contributing to the failure to maintain accurate and current care plans as required by facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙