Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0551
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Power of Attorney and Rights

Missouri City, Texas Survey Completed on 12-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to have her designated Power of Attorney (POA) exercise her rights, as required by state law. The POA, who was a friend and neighbor of the resident, provided a notarized Texas Durable Power of Attorney document to the facility. Despite the document being properly signed and notarized, the facility Administrator determined it was invalid, citing the resident's cognitive impairment and questioning the legitimacy of the notary. The Administrator instructed staff not to provide the requested clinical records to the POA and referred to the POA documentation as a 'trash piece of paper.' The resident in question was an elderly female with a history of altered mental status, muscle weakness, anxiety, and mood disturbance. Upon admission, her cognitive status was assessed as moderately impaired, but subsequent evaluations indicated she was alert, oriented, and had adequate judgment. The resident confirmed she knew her POA, trusted her, and was not coerced into signing the POA document. She also expressed willingness to move to another facility to be closer to her POA. Staff interviews revealed that the facility's decision to deny the POA's rights was influenced by a previously open Adult Protective Services (APS) case, although APS confirmed the case was closed with no allegations against the POA. The Social Worker and Administrator both cited concerns about the POA's validity due to the APS involvement and the resident's cognitive status, despite documentation and statements from both APS and the resident supporting the POA's legitimacy. The facility's actions resulted in the POA being denied access to the resident's clinical records and the ability to assist in her care decisions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙