Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0576
D

Failure to Provide Reasonable Telephone Access and Privacy

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents had reasonable access to and privacy in their use of telephones, as required by resident rights policies. Two residents were specifically affected: one resident, who was cognitively intact but had significant visual impairment, possessed a personal cell phone but was unable to use it effectively due to her declining vision. Her emergency contact reported frequent difficulties reaching her through the facility, as calls to the facility phone were rarely answered. The activities director indicated that a cordless phone was available for residents on her hallway, but this was not accessible to her. Another cognitively intact resident did not have a personal cell phone and relied on the facility-provided cordless phone, which was found to be non-operational. She reported repeated requests to nursing staff about the phone, being told it needed charging or was not working. Observation confirmed the phone was unplugged and the wiring was pushed into a hole in the wall. The DON initially claimed the phone was functional but, upon inspection, acknowledged the issue and deferred to maintenance, who confirmed the phone had not worked for an undetermined period. There was no alternative provided for bedbound residents to access a phone if they did not have a personal device. Interviews with facility leadership revealed a lack of clear procedures for family access to the building and for ensuring residents could communicate with individuals outside the facility, especially after business hours. The facility's own policy required access to a telephone and privacy for communication, but these requirements were not met for the affected residents, as evidenced by the inoperable phone and lack of alternative arrangements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙