Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0620
D

Failure to Provide Required Admission Documentation and Disclosures

Garland, Texas Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish and implement an admissions policy for one resident, as evidenced by the lack of a written admission agreement, consent to treat, resident rights notification, Medicare/Medicaid information, and disclosure of services and charges at the time of admission. The resident, a 71-year-old male with multiple complex medical conditions including a recent intracerebral hemorrhage, anxiety disorder, colostomy, urinary retention with catheter, and gastrostomy, was admitted from the hospital for a planned stay. Despite these needs, neither the resident nor his representative received any of the required admission documentation or information upon arrival. Interviews and record reviews revealed that the resident's representative was not provided with an admission packet, was not informed of the resident's rights, and did not receive any required disclosures or facility protocols. The representative reported that all communication regarding the admission occurred between the facility and the hospital, with no direct engagement or paperwork provided to the family. The facility attempted to obtain verbal consents and later requested the resident's social security information for billing, but the representative refused due to concerns about the admission and subsequent transfer to the emergency room. The Business Office Manager (BOM) confirmed responsibility for admission documentation and acknowledged that none of the required forms or consents were completed for this resident. The BOM stated that admission documentation typically begins on the day of admission and can be completed electronically, but in this case, there was no evidence that the resident or representative was notified or provided with the necessary documents. The facility's admission packet, which includes multiple forms and disclosures required by state and federal regulations, was not given to the resident or representative at the time of admission.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙