Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Nonverbal Resident

Corpus Christi, Texas Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with significant medical needs, including right-sided hemiplegia, aphasia, and dementia. The resident's care plan identified the need for the call light to be within reach as an intervention to reduce fall risk, but during an observation, the call light was found coiled on the floor approximately three feet from the resident's bed, out of the resident's reach. The resident, who was unable to speak and had limited ability to communicate, could only respond to questions with head movements and was unable to indicate how long the call light had been inaccessible. Interviews with staff confirmed that the call light should have been clipped to the bed within the resident's reach, and both a CNA and an LVN acknowledged the importance of call light accessibility, especially for this resident who could not verbally call for help. The Director of Nursing also stated that lack of access to the call light could result in delayed staff response to resident needs. Review of facility policy confirmed the requirement for a comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' needs, which was not fully implemented in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙