Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
E

Failure to Update Care Plans with Resident-Specific Transfer Methods

Hendersonville, Tennessee Survey Completed on 11-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise and update resident care plans to include resident-specific transfer methods, as required by facility policy and clinical documentation. For four residents reviewed for transfers, the care plans did not reflect the current transfer needs and methods, such as the use of mechanical lifts or the required number of staff for safe transfers. This deficiency was identified through policy review, medical record review, observations, and staff interviews. For example, one resident with a history of falls and total dependence for transfers was documented in therapy notes and on the Can-Do Information Sheet as requiring a Hoyer lift with two-person assistance. However, the care plan did not specify the use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. Another resident, who required a sit-to-stand mechanical lift and two-person assistance according to the Can-Do Information Sheet, also had a care plan that lacked this specific intervention. In both cases, staff interviews confirmed that the actual transfer methods used were not reflected in the care plans. Additional residents with significant mobility limitations, including those with severe cognitive impairment or a history of stroke, were also found to have care plans that did not match the documented transfer methods or staff assistance levels indicated in therapy assessments and Can-Do Information Sheets. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plans for these residents had not been revised to include the appropriate transfer methods, resulting in inconsistencies between the care plans and the actual care provided.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙