Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Gastrostomy

Smithfield, Rhode Island Survey Completed on 12-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program as required, specifically regarding the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a gastrostomy. Facility policy mandates the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities for residents with indwelling medical devices or wounds. Despite signage indicating EBP requirements in the resident's room, video surveillance footage on two separate dates showed that two nursing assistants provided morning care to the resident without wearing gowns, as required by policy. Interviews with the Infection Preventionist and the nursing assistants confirmed that the resident had been on EBP since admission and that staff were aware of the requirement to wear gowns and gloves during care. However, both nursing assistants acknowledged not wearing gowns during the observed care episodes. The Director of Nursing Services was unable to provide evidence that the facility maintained an infection control program to prevent the spread of infection related to EBP for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙