Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Resident Assessments Documented in MDS

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the current status of four residents, as required by policy and regulatory guidelines. For one resident with hemiplegia and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment contained conflicting information regarding the presence of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the assessment indicated both the absence and presence of a pressure ulcer, with further details showing a Stage 3 pressure ulcer documented. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the inaccuracy in the MDS coding for this resident. Another resident with nicotine dependence and hypertension was care planned for regular evaluation of safe smoking practices. However, the annual MDS assessment incorrectly indicated that the resident was not a current tobacco user, despite the resident's own statement and care plan documentation confirming daily supervised smoking. Similarly, a different resident with nicotine dependence and diabetes mellitus was also care planned for safe smoking but had their MDS assessment marked as not using tobacco and did not have nicotine dependence listed in the active diagnoses section, contrary to the clinical record and care plan. A further deficiency was identified for a resident with expressive aphasia and a history of stroke. The quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident's speech as clear, while observations, care plan documentation, and staff interviews indicated that the resident's speech was slurred and communication was primarily conducted through writing on a whiteboard. The DON acknowledged that the MDS should have reflected unclear speech based on the resident's documented status and care plan notes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙