Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Scheduled Personal Hygiene Care for Dependent Residents

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 09-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming for two residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living. For one resident with hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the clinical record and Kardex indicated the importance of allowing the resident to choose their preferred method of bathing, with scheduled shower days on Mondays and Thursdays. However, documentation showed that on several scheduled shower days, the resident did not receive a shower, and the task was marked as 'not applicable' rather than indicating a refusal or another reason for not providing the care. Similarly, another resident with dementia and hypertensive heart disease had a care plan emphasizing the importance of engaging in meaningful daily routines, including the choice of bathing method, with scheduled shower days on Mondays and Fridays. The clinical record revealed that on multiple scheduled shower days, the resident did not receive a shower, and the task was again marked as 'not applicable.' During an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator stated that if a resident refused a shower, it should be documented as a refusal, not as 'not applicable.'

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙