Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
G

Failure to Identify, Assess, and Treat Stage 2 Penile Pressure Ulcer on Admission

Portland, Oregon Survey Completed on 11-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident was admitted to the facility with a documented Stage 2 pressure ulcer located on the left lateral meatus of the penis, as indicated in the admission and discharge paperwork from the previous facility. The documentation included specific orders to apply triple antibiotic ointment every shift with catheter care and to consult the Resident Care Manager if the wound worsened. However, upon admission, the facility failed to identify, assess, treat, or monitor the pressure ulcer. The resident's initial skin assessment, care plan, physician orders, and subsequent clinical records did not mention the presence of the pressure ulcer or any related treatment. Throughout the resident's stay, there was no documentation in the medical record or treatment administration records regarding the penile pressure ulcer. Multiple staff members, including CNAs and nurses, observed signs of injury such as bleeding, a tear, or a split on the penis during perineal or catheter care, but these observations were either not documented or not followed up with appropriate assessment and intervention. The resident also reported discomfort and requested to see a urologist, but there was no evidence that these concerns were addressed. Progress notes and care plans continued to omit any reference to the pressure ulcer or its management. The resident was eventually hospitalized, where it was discovered that the Foley catheter had caused significant erosion of the penile tissue, resulting in traumatic hypospadias and permanent loss of normal urinary function. Hospital records and interviews with hospital staff confirmed that the injury was consistent with prolonged catheter-related pressure and not an acute event. Facility leadership and care management staff were unaware of the pressure ulcer at the time of the survey, despite its documentation at the prior facility and multiple staff observations during the resident's stay.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙