Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan and Ensure Supervision After Resident Elopement

Medford, Oregon Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise care plan interventions and re-evaluate a resident's elopement risk, resulting in inadequate supervision and failure to prevent repeated elopements for a resident with significant cognitive and physical impairments. The resident, who had diagnoses including psychosis, delusional disorder, schizophrenia, and suspected vascular dementia, was under guardianship and had documented impaired strength, balance, and endurance. Despite these factors, the care plan did not address the resident's elopement incidents, and no new interventions were developed after the resident left the facility on two occasions. Progress notes indicated the resident expressed a desire to leave, and staff allowed the resident to leave against medical advice (AMA), only leaving a voice message for the guardian rather than using the emergency contact as specified in the guardianship paperwork. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness regarding the resident's guardianship status and the appropriate procedures for contacting the guardian. Staff members believed the resident was alert and oriented and had the right to leave, despite documentation indicating the resident lacked decision-making capacity. The facility did not conduct investigations into either elopement incident, and staff failed to notify law enforcement or use the correct emergency contact methods. The guardian confirmed that she was not contacted appropriately and reiterated that the resident did not have the capacity to make decisions about leaving the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙