Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents

Coweta, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 11-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two of twenty-eight sampled residents. For one resident, the MDS assessment incorrectly indicated the use of an anticoagulant during the look-back period, while the resident was actually prescribed and administered an antiplatelet medication, Clopidogrel Bisulfate, for blood clot prevention. The MDS coordinator acknowledged the error, stating that the assessment was miscoded despite efforts to ensure accuracy during completion. For another resident, discrepancies were found in the discharge assessment. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including anemia, urinary tract infection, and arthritis, experienced a medical emergency and was sent to the hospital, where a pulmonary embolism was diagnosed. The resident died at the hospital, but the MDS discharge assessment inaccurately documented the resident as having died in the facility. The MDS coordinator confirmed after reviewing the clinical record that the discharge should have reflected a transfer to the hospital rather than a death in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙