Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0679
F

Failure to Assess and Meet Resident Activity Needs

Woodsfield, Ohio Survey Completed on 09-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to assess and meet the activity needs of all 35 residents, as evidenced by record review, observation, interviews, and review of the activity calendar and job descriptions. The activity calendar showed repetitive and limited activities, such as beverage cart and sit and chat, with only one main activity per day, and little to no evening programming. Observations and staff interviews confirmed that beverage cart and sit and chat were not considered meaningful activities by staff or residents, and that activities were often not conducted as scheduled. Residents and staff reported dissatisfaction with the lack of variety, frequency, and engagement in the activities provided, with some residents expressing boredom and a desire for more options. The memory care unit was particularly affected, with no specialized programming or activities provided for its residents. Observations revealed long periods with no activities, and staff confirmed that activity assessments had not been completed for memory care residents. Residents in this unit were often left without stimulation or opportunities to participate in group activities, and staff noted that when memory care residents were able to leave the unit for activities such as church, their mood improved significantly. However, such opportunities were rare, and the activity staff did not regularly provide or invite memory care residents to participate in activities. One resident with a history of major depression, anxiety disorder, and alcohol dependence in remission was specifically noted to have a care plan that included goals and interventions for activity participation, but reported that there were not enough activities to meet his needs. The activity director confirmed that she was the only member of the activity department, with limited time and resources to provide a variety of activities, and that the activity room was not accessible to residents outside of her working hours. The job description for the activity director outlined responsibilities for providing a comprehensive activity program, but these were not being met, as evidenced by the lack of assessments, limited programming, and resident and staff dissatisfaction.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙