Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Medical Record Documentation for Insulin Administration

Paulding, Ohio Survey Completed on 09-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including COPD, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, hypertension, Type II diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy, major depressive disorder, and carpal tunnel syndrome. The resident was cognitively intact according to the most recent assessment. A physician order specified that insulin lispro should be administered before meals only if the resident's blood sugar was 150 or higher, with instructions to hold the medication if the blood sugar was below this threshold. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) over several months revealed repeated documentation by an LPN that insulin was administered even when the resident's blood sugar was less than 150, contrary to the physician's order. Upon interview, the LPN confirmed that the insulin was not actually administered as documented and admitted to being unfamiliar with how to document when the blood sugar was outside the prescribed parameters. This resulted in inaccurate medical records for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙