Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care

West Carrollton, Ohio Survey Completed on 09-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with significant risk factors, including an indwelling catheter, severe cognitive impairment, and multiple unhealed pressure ulcers. According to the resident's care plan and physician orders, EBP was required due to the presence of open wounds and a urinary catheter, as well as a history of MRSA. During an observed wound care session, two LPNs provided treatment without donning gowns, although gloves were used. Their scrub tops came into contact with the resident's bed and covers during the procedure. PPE supplies were available outside the room, but the required gowns were not utilized. Interviews with the involved LPNs and facility leadership confirmed that staff were aware of the EBP requirements and had been trained to use both gloves and gowns during high-contact care activities such as wound care. One LPN incorrectly believed that EBP was no longer necessary since the resident had completed antibiotics and was not on contact isolation, while the Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing clarified that EBP should have been maintained due to the ongoing presence of wounds and a catheter. Facility policy explicitly required the use of gloves and gowns for residents with wounds or indwelling devices during high-contact care, but this protocol was not followed during the observed incident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙