Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Report Resident Elopement to State Agency

Jamestown, Ohio Survey Completed on 09-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to report an incident of resident elopement to the state agency as required. A resident with diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, and schizophrenia, who had a documented history of elopement and was identified as an elopement risk, left the facility without staff knowledge. The resident was supposed to be monitored with a wander guard device and redirected from exit areas, according to the care plan. Despite these interventions, the resident exited the facility, traveled to a nearby gas station, and entered a vehicle with a man known to the station manager. The manager, upon realizing the resident was from the facility, arranged for the resident to be returned. The administrator confirmed during an interview that a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) was not filed because she did not believe neglect had occurred, even though the resident was cognitively impaired and had left the facility unsupervised. Facility policy required reporting of such incidents within federally mandated timeframes, but this was not followed. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and was based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙