Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Secure Suprapubic Catheters as Ordered

Avon, Ohio Survey Completed on 10-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that suprapubic catheters were properly secured for two residents who required securement devices as part of their care. For one resident with multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, and other significant diagnoses, the care plan and physician orders specified the use of a catheter securement device to prevent accidental dislodgement, with orders to replace the device every seven days and as needed. Despite documentation indicating a securement device was in place, direct observation and staff interviews confirmed that the resident did not have a securement device at the time of inspection, and the resident was unaware of how long it had been missing. A second resident with paraplegia, diabetes, morbid obesity, and other chronic conditions also had a care plan and physician orders requiring a catheter securement device, with instructions for daily and shift monitoring. Observation revealed that this resident's suprapubic catheter was not secured, and both the resident and her husband reported never having seen a securement device in use during her stay. Staff interviews further confirmed the absence of the securement device. Facility policy required the use of a securement device or leg band for catheter care, but this was not followed for either resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙