Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
G

Failure to Implement Comprehensive Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Care

Columbus, Ohio Survey Completed on 10-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A cognitively impaired resident with multiple comorbidities, including diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and a recent surgical amputation, was admitted to the facility with a documented skin alteration to the coccyx. Upon admission, there were inconsistencies in the assessment and documentation of the resident's skin condition, with records alternately describing the area as moisture-associated skin damage (MASD), an open area, and an unstageable pressure ulcer. The initial assessments failed to provide a comprehensive description, staging, or measurements of the wound, and there was no clear photographic evidence to support the presence or stage of a pressure ulcer. Despite care plans and physician orders for skin care interventions, such as the application of Triad paste and HydraGuard, there was no documented evidence that staff consistently provided or encouraged turning and repositioning every two hours as required. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure timely notification and involvement of the wound nurse and wound physician when the skin alteration was first identified. The wound physician was not made aware of the resident's condition until several days after admission, and the wound nurse was not notified at all during the initial period. Weekly skin assessments and wound documentation were either incomplete or missing, with staff failing to document wound descriptions, measurements, or photographs as required by facility policy. The lack of comprehensive assessment, documentation, and timely intervention led to the deterioration of the resident's skin condition, resulting in the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer with necrosis that required debridement. The facility's failure to implement a resident-centered plan for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers, including appropriate assessment, documentation, and communication among staff and consulting clinicians, directly contributed to actual harm to the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙