Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Assess Entrapment Risk and Attempt Alternatives Prior to Side Rail Use

New Bern, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to assess entrapment risk and attempt alternatives prior to the use of side rails (u-shaped grab bars) for two residents. Both residents were admitted with significant medical conditions, including hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. Documentation in their electronic medical records showed that bed rail assessments were completed, indicating the use of bilateral u-shaped grab bars as enablers to promote independence, and both residents expressed a desire to have them. However, the assessments did not include any evaluation of entrapment risk or documentation of alternative interventions attempted before the installation of the grab bars. Care plans for both residents did not reference the use of u-shaped grab bars, despite their ongoing use. Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments indicated that one resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility and non-ambulatory, while the other was independent with bed mobility and transfers but had impairments in both lower extremities and one upper extremity. Observations confirmed that both residents were using the u-shaped grab bars in the raised position, and interviews with the residents confirmed their use for positioning and mobility assistance. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON, MDS Nurse, Administrator, and Rehabilitation Manager, revealed a lack of awareness regarding the requirement to conduct entrapment risk assessments and to attempt and document alternatives before implementing side rails. Staff believed that therapy or nursing assessments covered these requirements, but therapy staff clarified that they did not perform entrapment risk evaluations. The facility used a corporate-provided side rail assessment tool, but it did not prompt for entrapment risk evaluation or alternative interventions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙