Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Failure to Provide Written Information on Advance Directives at Admission

Fairview, North Carolina Survey Completed on 09-22-2025

Penalty

5 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide residents and their representatives with written information regarding advance directives and the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, as required by their own policy and federal regulations. Record review and interviews revealed that, for two residents, there was no evidence of an advance directive checklist, signed acknowledgment of receipt, or any documentation that written information about advance directives was provided at admission. The facility's admission packet did not include written materials about advance directives or the right to accept or refuse treatment, and there was no process in place to ensure residents or their representatives received or acknowledged this information. Interviews with the residents, their representatives, the Social Worker (who also served as the admission coordinator), and the Administrator confirmed that the facility's practice was to discuss only the Medical Order for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form, without providing any written literature about advance directives or the right to refuse care. Both residents and their representatives were unaware of what an advance directive was and did not recall receiving any information on the topic. The Social Worker and Administrator acknowledged that the facility did not include written information about advance directives in the admission process and were unaware of the requirement to do so.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙