Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0726
E

Failure to Validate and Document Nurse Competencies

Clayton, North Carolina Survey Completed on 10-30-2025

Penalty

Fine: $255,500
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a working system to evaluate and validate the competencies of nurses in skills, facility procedures, and knowledge, as evidenced by the lack of completed competency checklists and inadequate orientation for newly hired nurses. Three nurses were reviewed for competency validation, and it was found that two of them did not have completed competency checklists on file. The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) reported that the process relied heavily on self-evaluation and verbal confirmation of skills, rather than direct observation or demonstration, and there was confusion about who was responsible for validating competencies when the SDC was working part-time. One resident was admitted with multiple complex medical conditions, including a history of stroke, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and a gastrostomy tube. The nurse assigned to this resident reported difficulty accessing the resident's electronic medical record, was unaware of the resident's orders, and had not received adequate training on facility procedures or the location of necessary supplies. The nurse also communicated protected health information via personal text message to a nurse practitioner, stating he had not been trained on secure communication protocols. Another newly hired nurse also reported being unable to access orders or the hospital discharge summary in the electronic record and was unsure about the procedures for medication and enteral feeding administration. In a separate incident, another newly hired nurse was unable to use the intercom system to call for help during a medical emergency and had difficulty locating emergency equipment, such as an AMBU bag. Other staff members also reported uncertainty about emergency procedures and the use of the intercom system. The SDC confirmed that while there was a process for orientation and competency validation, it was inconsistently applied, and documentation was missing for some nurses. Interviews with administrative staff revealed a lack of clarity regarding who was responsible for ensuring competency validation, and no completed competency checklists could be found for two of the nurses involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙