Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Administer Enteral Feedings as Ordered for Tube-Fed Resident

Clayton, North Carolina Survey Completed on 10-30-2025

Penalty

Fine: $255,500
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A diabetic resident with severe dysphagia, recurrent pneumonia, and a newly placed gastrostomy tube was admitted to the facility following hospitalization for multiple acute conditions. Upon admission, medical orders were entered for enteral feedings via PEG tube at specific intervals, with corresponding water flushes before and after each feeding. However, documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that none of the scheduled enteral feedings were administered on the day of admission, and there was no indication that the resident received any nutrition as ordered. Interviews with staff revealed significant communication and documentation failures. The interim DON, who was the Unit Manager at the time, stated that orders were entered and that a nurse was assigned responsibility for the resident. However, the assigned nurse reported he was not informed about the resident's admission or his responsibility for the resident, and only became aware of the situation when called to address bleeding at the gastrostomy tube site. He was unable to locate the resident's orders or discharge summary in the electronic record and did not administer the enteral feeding. The nurse on the following shift also could not access the necessary orders or discharge summary and did not provide the enteral feeding, though she did perform tube flushes as prompted by the MAR. On the day after admission, a new order for enteral feeding was entered with revised administration times. The MAR indicated that only two feedings were documented as given that day, rather than the four scheduled. The medication aide confirmed that she only called the covering nurse to administer the enteral feeding twice, as those were the only times flagged on the MAR. There was no documentation of hypoglycemic episodes during this period, but the resident did not receive enteral feedings as ordered for two consecutive days.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙