Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Advance Directive Documentation for a Resident

Gastonia, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that advance directive information was accurate and consistent throughout the medical record for a resident. The resident's electronic health record (EHR) contained conflicting physician orders regarding code status, with one order indicating Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and another indicating Full Code. The resident's care plan also listed the code status as Full Code, while the Advance Directives binder at the nursing station contained both a signed DNR form and a Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form indicating Full Code. The DNR form was signed by a physician and had no expiration date, while the MOST form was signed by both the resident and the physician. Staff interviews and observations revealed further inconsistencies and confusion regarding the resident's code status. The Social Worker and a nurse both identified the presence of the outdated DNR form in the Advance Directives binder but did not remove it, instead placing it back in the binder after review. The nurse stated she would check the EHR and MOST form to confirm code status, while the resident himself stated he was a DNR. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the code status information in the Advance Directive binder and the EHR should match, but this was not the case for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙