Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
E

Failure to Provide Timely Foot Care and Podiatry Services

Shelby, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure appropriate foot care for three residents, resulting in untrimmed, thick, and curling toenails, and a lack of timely podiatry services. For each of the three residents, weekly nursing assessments did not document the need for toenail care, and there was no evidence in the electronic medical records that referrals to podiatry had been made or that the residents had been seen by a podiatrist. Observations revealed that all three residents had long, thick toenails, with some nails curling inward or appearing blackened, and staff interviews confirmed that these issues had not been reported or addressed. One resident with a traumatic brain injury and contractures was completely dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and was severely cognitively impaired. Despite this, her toenails were observed to be thick, long, and in poor condition, with no record of podiatry referral or care since admission. Another resident with a left above-the-knee amputation and peripheral vascular disease was also dependent on staff for personal care. His toenails were found to be thick and curling, and although staff recognized the need for podiatry intervention, no referral had been made, and he had not been scheduled for podiatry clinic visits. A third resident with peripheral artery disease and a below-the-knee amputation was similarly dependent on staff and unable to care for her own toenails. Her toenails were observed to be long and curling, and although she had previously refused podiatry care, there was no documentation of follow-up or rescheduling for podiatry services. Interviews with nursing staff, the nurse practitioner, the DON, and the social worker revealed a lack of communication and follow-up regarding residents' toenail care needs. Staff members often could not recall if they had reported the need for podiatry services, and the process for adding residents to the podiatry list was inconsistently followed. The DON and social worker acknowledged that sometimes follow-up did not occur as it should, resulting in residents not receiving necessary foot care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙