Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Tracheostomy Care

Washington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 09-05-2025

Penalty

Fine: $16,720
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nurse #4 failed to follow the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy during high-contact care for a resident with a tracheostomy. The EBP policy, dated 4/24/24, requires staff to don gloves and gowns prior to performing high-contact resident care activities, such as tracheostomy care, to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs). During an observation, Nurse #4 performed hand hygiene and donned gloves but did not wear a gown while providing tracheostomy care and suctioning to the resident, despite clear signage and available personal protective equipment (PPE) at the resident's door indicating the requirement for both gloves and gowns. Upon interview, Nurse #4 stated she did not wear a gown because she believed EBP was only necessary for incontinence care, and only realized the requirement after reading the posted EBP sign. The Infection Preventionist, Director of Nursing, and Administrator all confirmed that Nurse #4 should have worn a gown in addition to gloves during the procedure, as per facility policy. The Medical Director noted that the respiratory tract is not a sterile space and did not believe the resident was put at risk, but acknowledged the policy was not followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙