Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Consistently Update and Match Advance Directive Documentation

Salisbury, North Carolina Survey Completed on 09-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that advance directive information was consistently updated and matched across all relevant documentation for two residents. For one resident, there was a discrepancy between the physician's order, which indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), and both the face sheet and Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form, which indicated full code status. Staff interviews revealed that the resident's code status had recently changed from DNR to full code, but the physician's order was not updated to reflect this change. Both the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the orders should have been updated to match the resident's current wishes as documented on the MOST form and face sheet. For another resident, the physician's order indicated full code status, while the face sheet, DNR form, and MOST form all indicated DNR status. This resident was cognitively intact at the time of admission. Staff interviews confirmed that the advance directive information in the physician's order was not updated when the DNR form was signed by the physician. Both the ADON and DON stated that all documentation should have matched to accurately reflect the resident's advance directive wishes, but the necessary updates were not made in the system.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙