Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Administer Oxygen as Ordered and Lack of Required Signage

Lexington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for two residents by not adhering to physician orders for oxygen administration and by not displaying required 'oxygen in use' signage. One resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic bronchitis had a physician order for continuous oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula. However, observations on multiple occasions revealed the oxygen concentrator was set at 3.5 L/min, exceeding the prescribed rate. Staff interviews confirmed that the medication aide did not check the flow rate at eye level and was unaware of the discrepancy, while the nurse had not checked the concentrator during her shift. The Medical Director confirmed that no order had been given to increase the oxygen rate and expected staff to follow the existing order. Additionally, there was no 'oxygen in use' signage on the resident's door during several observations, and the DON was unaware that such signage was required. Another resident with a history of shortness of breath and atherosclerotic heart disease had a physician order for oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation at 92% or above. Observations over two days showed the oxygen concentrator was set at 6 L/min, significantly higher than the ordered rate. The nurse responsible for this resident admitted she had not checked the oxygen settings on either day, despite signing the medication administration record as if the task had been completed. The Medical Director was not aware of any clinical need for the increased oxygen rate and expected staff to follow the prescribed orders and monitor oxygen saturations every shift. In both cases, the facility's staff failed to ensure that oxygen was administered at the prescribed rate and did not consistently check or document the oxygen settings as required. The lack of 'oxygen in use' signage and the failure to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy were confirmed through record reviews, direct observations, and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙