Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Provide Written Grievance Response Summaries

Lexington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide written grievance response summaries to residents' representatives (RRs) for grievances filed on behalf of three residents. According to the facility's grievance policy, the Grievance Official is required to inform the resident of the results of the investigation and provide a written grievance decision upon request. However, the policy did not specify procedures for handling grievances filed by individuals other than the resident, such as RRs. Review of the grievance logs and concern forms revealed that, in each case, the resolution of the grievance was communicated verbally, either by phone or in person, but no written summary was provided to the RRs. For one resident, who was cognitively intact, the RR filed a grievance regarding negative staff interaction. The concern form indicated that the Social Worker notified the RR by phone, but no written response was given. The RR confirmed during an interview that she had never received or been offered a written resolution, only verbal communication. Similar patterns were observed for two other residents: one with moderately impaired cognition and another who was cognitively intact. Their RRs initiated multiple grievances related to staff concerns, laundry, care, and cleanliness, but in each instance, the resolution was communicated verbally, and no written summary was provided. Interviews with the Social Worker, who maintained the grievance log, revealed a lack of awareness that a written response was required for grievances. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the requirement for written grievance responses but was not aware that this was not being consistently offered or provided to RRs. The deficiency was identified through record review, interviews with RRs, and staff interviews, all confirming the absence of written grievance response summaries as required by regulatory guidelines.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙