Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0732
C

Inaccurate Daily Posting of Resident Census on Staffing Forms

Lumberton, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the daily posting of health care staff census information for 15 out of 29 days reviewed. Record review showed that the posted census numbers on the daily staffing forms did not match the detailed census reports for multiple dates. The discrepancies included both over-reporting and under-reporting of the actual resident census. The daily posting was completed by the Staffing Scheduler, who relied on census numbers provided during the morning meeting by the admission Director. The census number used was based on the count at midnight and was not updated to reflect admissions or discharges that occurred after that time. Interviews with the Staffing Scheduler and the admission Director revealed a lack of clarity and consistency in how the census numbers were determined and reported. The Staffing Scheduler did not update the posted census if changes occurred after the initial count, and the admission Director confirmed that the number provided did not always include recent admissions or discharges. The Administrator was unaware of these discrepancies and confirmed that the posted census reflected the midnight count rather than the current census for the day.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙