Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plans for Code Status and Hospice Services

Greensboro, North Carolina Survey Completed on 09-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise and update the care plan for two residents as required. For one resident with diagnoses including diabetes and chronic lung disease, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented that the resident was cognitively intact and had a life expectancy of less than six months, and was receiving Hospice services. Despite a physician order changing the resident's code status from full code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), the care plan continued to reflect the previous full code status and did not address the new DNR order. Additionally, after a physician order for a Hospice referral and subsequent admission to Hospice, there was no care plan in place addressing Hospice services for the resident. Interviews with the MDS nurse and the DON revealed that care plans were expected to be reviewed and updated daily during clinical care meetings with the interdisciplinary team. However, both staff members acknowledged that the care plan for this resident had not been updated to reflect the changes in code status or the initiation of Hospice services. The DON was not aware of the omissions until the time of the interview, despite regular care plan reviews being part of the facility's process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙