Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
E

Lack of Physician Rationale for Not Following Pharmacist's Antidepressant Dose Reduction Recommendation

Las Cruces, New Mexico Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a physician provided documentation of a clinical rationale for not following a consultant pharmacist's recommendation regarding a resident's antidepressant medication regimen. Specifically, a resident with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, insomnia, and major depressive disorder had been prescribed escitalopram 20 mg daily since admission. The consultant pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of escitalopram, but the provider declined this recommendation, stating only that the resident had a good response and to maintain the current dose, without providing a clinical rationale for not attempting the GDR. Review of the resident's medical record confirmed that no clinical rationale was documented for declining the pharmacist's recommendation. Interviews with the DON and Medical Director further confirmed that the provider did not document a reason for not conducting a GDR, despite facility expectations that such rationale should be provided when a GDR is not attempted for antidepressant medications. This lack of documentation was identified during record review and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙