Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident's Preference for Care Team Assignment

Jersey City, New Jersey Survey Completed on 11-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's preference regarding their care team by not removing a specific nurse from the resident's care, despite a request from the resident's family member. The family member had asked on 4/11/25 for a particular LPN to be removed from the resident's care team, but records showed that the LPN continued to administer medications and perform assessments for the resident after this date. The resident in question had severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of zero, and a history of behavioral problems, including refusing care and aggression toward staff. Interviews with facility leadership revealed that there was no clear documentation or explanation as to why the LPN was not removed from the resident's care team following the family's request. The Director of Nursing stated that the usual procedure would involve a meeting with the family to discuss concerns, but could not provide further information about this specific case. The facility's policy on resident rights, which includes the right to reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences, was reviewed but not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙