Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Deficient Incontinence Care and Delayed Meal Delivery

Clifton, New Jersey Survey Completed on 10-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified deficiencies related to the provision of incontinence care and timely meal delivery for residents. On the observed unit, there was only one CNA present to distribute breakfast trays, resulting in meal trays being left unattended and not delivered to residents within the expected timeframe. The DON confirmed that meal trays should be delivered within 5 to 10 minutes of arrival to keep food warm, but observations showed that the last tray was not delivered until significantly later. Staff interviews revealed that the lack of a written policy and reliance on verbal communication contributed to inconsistent meal delivery practices. Incontinence care deficiencies were also observed for two residents. One resident, who was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with ADLs, was found to be wearing double incontinence briefs, a practice not documented in the care plan and not in line with facility expectations unless specifically requested and documented. The CNA responsible stated that the double briefs were applied at the resident's request, but the RN and LPNS were unaware of this and confirmed it was not standard practice. The resident's care plan did not reflect this preference, and the DON stated that such preferences should be documented, especially for residents who are cognitively intact. A second resident was also found with double incontinence briefs, with staff unable to confirm who applied them and the care plan not reflecting this intervention until after surveyor inquiry. The resident was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of urinary incontinence. The DON stated that double briefs should only be used if requested by the resident and documented in the care plan, and that this practice increases the risk of skin impairment and urinary tract infection. Facility policies reviewed did not provide clear guidance on the use of double incontinence briefs or the process for meal tray distribution, contributing to the observed deficiencies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙