Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Failure to Assess and Prevent Resident Elopement

Sutherland, Nebraska Survey Completed on 09-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to accurately assess a resident for elopement risk, did not provide appropriate interventions to prevent elopement, and did not implement new interventions after repeated incidents. The resident in question had a history of Parkinson's Disease, traumatic brain injury, and schizo-affective disorder, and was admitted with a care plan that allowed for independent outdoor activity. Despite documentation indicating the resident required supervision or assistance with mobility, the admission assessment incorrectly stated the resident was not at risk for elopement, as it was believed the resident could not exit the facility independently. The resident was able to leave the facility without staff knowledge or the use of assistive devices on two separate occasions. On one occasion, the resident exited the building without signing out or notifying staff, and on another, the resident was found by police sitting in the road outside the facility. After the first incident, the resident was not reassessed for elopement risk, and no incident or accident report was completed as required by facility policy. The care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's actual risk or to implement new interventions after these events. Interviews with the DON confirmed that the initial assessment was inaccurate and that the resident's known history of independent exits from previous living situations was not properly considered. The facility's failure to reassess the resident after the first elopement, to complete required documentation, and to update the care plan or implement further interventions directly contributed to the repeated elopement incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙