Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Safe Means for Sexual Expression and Privacy

Kansas City, Missouri Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to uphold residents' rights to a dignified existence, self-determination, and safe sexual expression for three sampled residents who were sexually active. The facility's policy required that residents be informed of their rights, including the right to privacy, reasonable accommodation of preferences, and participation in social activities, provided these did not infringe on others' rights. Despite this, interviews and record reviews revealed that the facility did not provide access to condoms or a designated private area for residents to engage in consensual sexual activity. One resident, with a history of psychiatric disorders and a guardian, was found to have the capacity to consent to sexual activity but reported no interest in sexual activity and noted the absence of condoms and uncertainty about private spaces. Another resident, with multiple mental health diagnoses but no history of sexual inappropriateness, was also cognitively intact and expressed interest in sexual activity, stating that condoms were not available in the facility. A third resident, with a history of schizoaffective disorder and substance dependence in remission, also had the capacity to consent and expressed a desire for both condoms and a private space, recalling that such resources were previously available but no longer provided. Facility leadership acknowledged that while they had discussed providing condoms and private spaces, they did not implement these measures due to a perceived lack of expressed interest from residents. Interviews confirmed that residents had not been offered sexual health resources or education recently, and the facility had not pursued further action to support safe sexual activity, despite residents' rights and expressed needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙