Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
F

Failure to Follow Menus, Recipes, and Resident Preferences in Meal Service

Saint Louis, Missouri Survey Completed on 11-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that menus and recipes were followed as written, resulting in residents not receiving meals that met their documented nutritional needs and preferences. During breakfast meal observations, staff did not serve the breakfast sandwiches listed on the menu, instead providing items such as eggs, bacon, and oatmeal. Residents reported through interviews and resident council meetings that the meals served often did not match the posted menus, and this concern had been ongoing without resolution. The Dietary Manager confirmed that breakfast sandwiches should have been served, but staff chose not to prepare them, citing resident limitations and preferences without documented justification or menu changes. Further deficiencies were observed in the preparation of special diets, specifically puree diets. Staff did not follow the facility's puree egg recipe, instead blending scrambled and hardboiled eggs with unmeasured amounts of hot water, resulting in a product that was thick, chunky, bland, and gritty. The recipe book was not consulted during preparation, and the staff member was unsure of the quantities used. Similarly, oatmeal was prepared with unmeasured ingredients and insufficient cooking time, resulting in a thin, watery, and undercooked product. The oatmeal was not pureed for residents on puree diets as required by the recipe, and the staff member admitted to being pressed for time. Additionally, the facility failed to accommodate resident meal preferences as documented on meal tickets. One resident, who was supposed to receive fresh fruit with each meal, consistently did not receive it despite it being listed on the meal ticket and fresh fruit being available in the kitchen. The resident reported receiving the same breakfast daily without the requested fruit, and staff acknowledged that preferences should be followed when possible. These failures had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙