Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Privacy During Incontinence Care

Richton, Mississippi Survey Completed on 10-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and dignity during the provision of incontinence care. Two CNAs provided care to a resident with severe cognitive impairment, including vascular dementia, without pulling the privacy curtain or that of the roommate, leaving the resident exposed in full view of the roommate who was present and facing the resident. This action was observed directly by surveyors during the care procedure. Interviews with the CNAs involved revealed that one did not consider the privacy issue at the time, while the other acknowledged awareness of the privacy requirement but noted the curtain did not fully close. The facility's policies and training materials, as well as statements from the Staff Development Coordinator and DON, confirmed that staff were instructed and expected to ensure privacy for all residents during personal care, and that the failure to do so violated the resident's right to respectful and dignified care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙