Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Individualized Continence Care and Assessment

Mabel, Minnesota Survey Completed on 10-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decline in continence and urinary symptoms for a resident diagnosed with Huntington's disease. Upon admission, the resident was continent of bowel and bladder, but began experiencing fluctuating symptoms of incontinence, urgency, and frequency. The facility's continence evaluation assessment lacked detailed information regarding the circumstances and type of incontinence, and did not document interventions or treatments that had previously improved the resident's condition. The assessment inconsistently identified the type of incontinence and omitted a summary, while the resident's risk factors, such as cognitive impairment and use of antipsychotics, were not fully addressed. Documentation revealed that the resident experienced a change in continence status, with multiple episodes of incontinence and urinary urgency noted over several weeks. Despite these changes, the care plan addressing urinary continence was not initiated until several weeks after the initial assessment, and it did not include individualized goals or interventions to prevent further decline or manage urinary symptoms. The care plan focused on activities of daily living and fall prevention, but lacked a comprehensive bladder assessment or a voiding diary to inform an appropriate toileting schedule. Incident reports indicated that toileting was a causal factor in several falls, yet there was no evidence of a thorough assessment to determine the type of incontinence or to develop a tailored toileting program. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness regarding the resident's specific toileting needs, with staff following a standard two-hour toileting schedule for all residents rather than an individualized plan. The resident reported feeling unsupported, stating that staff did not offer regular toileting assistance and that she sometimes attempted to toilet herself, resulting in falls and emotional distress. The facility's incontinence policy required appropriate treatment and services to maintain continence, but the documentation and staff interviews demonstrated that these standards were not met for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙