Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Resident with Multiple Falls

Mabel, Minnesota Survey Completed on 10-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident with a history of falls. The resident, who had diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, experienced three documented falls after admission. Incident reports and progress notes detailed unwitnessed falls from a wheelchair and bed, with specific dates and circumstances recorded in the resident's medical record. Despite this documentation, the 5-day MDS assessment for the resident was incorrectly coded to indicate that no falls had occurred since admission. The MDS Coordinator/registered nurse acknowledged during an interview that the assessment was inaccurate and that the falls had been missed during the review of risk management reports and progress notes. Facility policy requires that MDS assessments consistently reflect information in progress notes and other records, which was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙