Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Address Grievances Regarding Delayed Call Light Response

Bigfork, Minnesota Survey Completed on 11-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow up on grievances related to call light response times for two residents who required substantial assistance for mobility, transfers, and toileting due to conditions such as paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction, and multiple sclerosis. Both residents were dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers using a mechanical lift, and their care plans identified them as high risk for pressure injuries and self-care deficits. Despite these needs, documented grievances and interviews revealed that call lights were not being answered in a timely manner, with multiple instances of response times exceeding one hour. Facility grievance forms and call light logs showed repeated concerns about long wait times for call light responses, particularly during morning and afternoon shifts. Staff interviews confirmed that call lights for these residents, who required two-person assistance, were often delayed due to staffing shortages and prioritization of other units. The logs documented numerous occasions where call lights remained unanswered for over an hour, and both residents reported experiencing significant delays in receiving assistance for their care needs. Interviews with staff indicated that monitoring systems were in place, but response times were still prolonged, especially for residents outside the secured dementia unit. The facility was unable to provide a policy related to call light response when requested. The lack of prompt response to call lights and insufficient follow-up on grievances demonstrated a failure to honor residents' rights to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and to make prompt efforts to resolve those grievances.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙