Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
G

Failure to Timely Update and Implement Fall Prevention Interventions

Two Harbors, Minnesota Survey Completed on 09-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that person-centered fall interventions were care planned and implemented for a resident at risk for falls, resulting in actual harm. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including metabolic encephalopathy, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, anxiety disorder, and severe cognitive impairment, and required assistance with all activities of daily living. The care plan identified the resident as a fall risk due to a history of falls, impaired gait and mobility, and other medical conditions. Despite this, there were lapses in updating and implementing fall prevention interventions following incidents. The resident experienced several falls, including one that resulted in a rib fracture. After a fall on one occasion, a floor mat was identified as a new intervention, but it was not added to the care plan until a later date. Similarly, after another fall, a soft touch call light was determined to be an appropriate intervention, but this was also not promptly updated in the care plan. Staff interviews revealed that not all staff were aware of the required interventions at the time of the incidents, as these were not reflected in the care plan or care guide sheets used by staff. Observations confirmed that some interventions, such as the floor mat, were not present in the resident's room at the time of a fall. Documentation and staff statements indicated that the process for updating care plans and communicating new interventions to staff was inconsistent. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) would determine interventions after reviewing incidents, but there were delays in updating the care plan and care sheets, leading to gaps in staff awareness and implementation of fall prevention measures. As a result, the resident did not consistently receive the interventions identified as necessary to prevent further falls and injury.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙