Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
E

Failure to Investigate and Protect Residents After Allegations of Abuse

New London, Minnesota Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

38 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed and to protect residents after allegations of rushed, harsh, and physically abusive care by a nursing assistant were reported. Multiple residents described ongoing inappropriate behavior and treatment by the nursing assistant, including being handled roughly during care, experiencing pain, and being subjected to demeaning or condescending remarks. Despite these complaints, there was no documentation of a comprehensive investigation, no identification of the residents involved in the initial written warning, and no evidence that follow-up with affected residents was completed. Interviews with residents revealed specific concerns about the nursing assistant's conduct, such as being moved too quickly or roughly during transfers, causing pain, and making residents feel anxious, worthless, or angry. Some residents reported avoiding care from the nursing assistant or refusing showers due to discomfort. Staff interviews confirmed that concerns about the nursing assistant's behavior had been reported to facility leadership, but there was no indication that these reports led to a formal investigation or protective measures for the residents. Facility records showed that the nursing assistant continued to work with all residents until the state agency brought the allegations to the attention of the administrator. The facility's own abuse prevention policy requires immediate notification of the administrator, documentation, investigation, and protective actions when abuse is alleged. However, the facility did not follow these procedures, as there was no evidence of resident assessments, witness interviews, or separation of the accused staff member from residents during the investigation period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙