Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Timely Report and Accurately Document Suspected Abuse Incidents

Rochester Hills, Michigan Survey Completed on 10-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement effective policies and procedures to ensure the timely reporting of suspected abuse, neglect, or theft, as required by section 1150B of the Act. In multiple incidents involving three residents, staff did not accurately or promptly report resident-to-resident physical altercations to the appropriate authorities. Documentation submitted to the State Agency did not fully represent the extent of the events as recorded in witness statements and the electronic medical record (EMR). For example, an incident where one resident struck another in the face was not reported to the Administrator until approximately seven hours after it occurred, and the initial report did not reflect the severity of the injury, which was later determined to be a fractured jaw. Further review revealed that staff, including a nurse who witnessed the incidents, did not consistently report all observed altercations. The nurse described witnessing additional aggressive interactions between residents, including physical assaults, but admitted to not reporting some of these events. The nurse also indicated a lack of training regarding the facility's abuse reporting protocols and expectations. There was no evidence that this nurse had received any abuse prevention or reporting education from the facility, despite the facility's claim of recent staff education efforts. Interviews with the Administrator and DON confirmed gaps in understanding and execution of reporting requirements. The Administrator delayed reporting an incident based on an initial assessment that there was no injury, only reporting after learning of a serious injury. The facility's own policy required immediate reporting of all allegations or suspicions of abuse to the Administrator and state agencies, but this was not followed. Additionally, the facility could not provide evidence that all staff, including agency nurses, had received the required training on abuse reporting procedures.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙