Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
E

Failure to Provide Required 30-Day Discharge Notices

North Bethesda, Maryland Survey Completed on 11-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a required 30-day written notice of discharge to two residents who were being discharged from the facility. In the first case, the Social Services Director (SSD) attempted to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to the resident's family, indicating the end of Medicare Part A coverage and a planned discharge date. However, the family declined to sign the NOMNC, and the SSD explained that the facility could not provide hospice care. Despite this, there was no documentation that a 30-day written discharge notice, including the reason for discharge, was provided to the resident or their representative. The resident's representative confirmed that they did not receive such notice and only received the NOMNC, which was confusing as the resident still had Medicare days remaining. The SSD and DON both confirmed that the discharge was initiated by the facility due to the need for hospice care, not by the family, and that the required 30-day notice was not issued. In the second case, the SSD documented issuing a NOMNC to the family of another resident, with services ending shortly thereafter and a discharge to the community planned. The family appealed the NOMNC, but there was no evidence in the medical record that a 30-day discharge notice was provided to the resident's representative. Interviews with the NHA, DON, and SSD confirmed that the resident was discharged because it was determined they would benefit from a memory care unit, and that only the NOMNC was issued, not the required 30-day discharge notice. These findings were reviewed with facility leadership.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙