Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Address Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review Recommendations

Chestertown, Maryland Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations made by the consulting pharmacist were addressed by the provider for several residents. In one case, a resident was prescribed multiple psychotropic medications, including Alprazolam, Gabapentin, and Quetiapine. The pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for these medications, but there was no evidence that the resident was re-evaluated by psychiatry after the recommendation. Additionally, the medical director increased the resident's Seroquel dosage without documenting the rationale or addressing the pharmacist's GDR recommendation. Interviews with the DON and medical director confirmed that no documentation was available to support the clinical decisions or to show that the pharmacist's recommendations were considered. For another resident, the facility's records showed that the pharmacist identified irregularities in the MRRs on two separate occasions. However, there was no documentation in the medical record indicating that these irregularities were addressed by the provider. The DON acknowledged the concern when interviewed and confirmed that the provider did not respond to the pharmacist's recommendations. A third resident's records revealed that the pharmacist recommended a GDR for several psychotropic medications, but the provider did not respond to these recommendations or make adjustments to the medications until several months later. There was also no documentation from the physician indicating agreement or disagreement with the pharmacist's recommendations, nor evidence of non-pharmacological interventions being provided. The DON was unable to provide documentation of such interventions when asked.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙